Skip to content

Excerpts, not downloads — and here is why

Every full CDR published online ends up in the text-matching database Engineers Australia checks against. We show you the difference between weak and strong writing instead, so you can apply it to your own projects.

Before and after

Same project. Different engineer on the page.

Three illustrative rewrites, written to show the pattern rather than taken from any client's report. In each case the weak version describes a project and the strong version demonstrates a competency element.

PE2.1 · Application of established engineering methods

Civil / structural

Weak — demonstrates nothing

The project involved the design of a 12-storey commercial building. The design team used ETABS to model the structure and the design was completed as per Australian standards. My role was to assist the senior engineer with the analysis.

Strong — evidences the element

I developed the ETABS model for the 12-storey moment frame and applied the load combinations from AS/NZS 1170.0. My analysis returned an inter-storey drift of 1/380 under serviceability wind, exceeding the 1/500 limit I had adopted from the client brief. I proposed relocating two columns to shorten the 11.4 m span, hand-checked the revised drift using a portal-frame approximation, and confirmed 1/620 in the updated model. The change was adopted at the design review.

Why it works: Names the method, the standard, the number, the problem, the decision and the verification — all attributable to one person.

PE2.3 · Systematic engineering synthesis and design

Electrical

Weak — demonstrates nothing

I was responsible for the electrical design of the substation. I prepared the single-line diagram and selected the equipment according to the client requirements and relevant standards.

Strong — evidences the element

I sized the 11 kV feeder for the substation by calculating the maximum demand at 842 A after diversity, then checked three cable options against current rating, voltage drop and fault withstand to AS/NZS 3008. The 300 mm² option met current rating but returned 4.1% voltage drop at full load against my 2.5% target, so I selected 2×185 mm² in parallel, which returned 2.2% and improved the fault withstand margin from 1.1 to 1.6.

Why it works: Shows options considered, criteria applied and the trade-off resolved — which is what synthesis and design actually means.

PE3.1 · Ethical conduct and professional accountability

Mechanical

Weak — demonstrates nothing

I always maintained high ethical standards and followed the company code of conduct throughout the project.

Strong — evidences the element

During factory acceptance testing I found that the pressure vessel's hydrostatic test certificate referenced a different serial number from the vessel delivered. The programme was already two weeks late and the site manager asked whether it could be accepted pending paperwork. I declined, documented the discrepancy, and required a witnessed re-test under AS 1210. The re-test passed and delivery slipped four days.

Why it works: Ethics is demonstrated by a decision with a cost, not asserted as a personal quality.

A warning about free CDR samples

Engineers Australia runs every submission through text-matching software and cross-checks it against its own archive of previous applications. A published sample you found in a search result has been found by thousands of other applicants too. Adapting one — changing the numbers, rewording the sentences — is still detectable, and a plagiarism finding can attract a ban of up to twelve months.

Questions about samples

Why don't you publish full CDR samples?

Every published sample enters the text-matching databases Engineers Australia uses. Applicants who adapt a published sample — even lightly — risk a plagiarism finding and a ban of up to twelve months. Publishing full samples would generate traffic at our clients' expense.

Can I see a sample before I order?

We share anonymised excerpts in your own discipline during the consultation, with client details removed and permission obtained. What we will not do is hand over a complete report that could be copied.

Are free CDR samples online safe to use?

Safe to read for structure; dangerous to reuse. Treat them as an illustration of format and never as source text. Engineers Australia text-matches every submission against published sources and its own archive of previous applications.

What should I do instead of copying a sample?

Work from your own project records — drawings, calculations, reports, emails. The engineering detail that satisfies an assessor is specific to what you did, and it cannot be borrowed from anyone else's project.

Want the rules rather than the examples? Read the MSA booklet explained and the Stage 1 competencies.

Want to see excerpts in your own discipline?

Ask at the free consultation. We share anonymised excerpts relevant to your ANZSCO code, with client details removed — not a downloadable report anyone could copy.

Reply within 4 business hours Your documents stay confidential WhatsApp us